|
Main Forum Page
|
The Gyroscope Forum |
28 April 2024 01:52
|
|
Welcome to the gyroscope forum. If you have a question about gyroscopes in general,
want to know how they work, or what they can be used for then you can leave your question here for others to answer.
You may also be able to help others by answering some of the questions on the site.
|
Question |
| Asked by: |
PATRICK |
| Subject: |
PERPETUALITY |
| Question: |
If laithwaites module of a prototype was magnets placed at end of spokes approx 36 lets say on a wheel much like millenium wheel to pass by one opposing magnet placed at base of rotating wheel as in pictures of him....then yes he was sureley on to something as proven by maglev..but then take that wheel lay it down horizontaly have 359 spokes with positive or negative magnets at end giving 359 points in circumference... and then place an outer ring with an air gap of a cicumferance greater by *.which comprises of 367 magnets in repultion to that of the inner over 360 degrees. then the outer is always in transit as both being of prime numbers there is only 1 point at a time that inner and outer alighn but more pushers and more pullers in the whole surrond ie 179 before 179 after and only one in alighnment....so strange that 359 and 367 are primes but then does this not speak clear that for perpetuality to work there must always be repultion of some factor always to traverse on an on..laithwaites module had only one magnet of opposition in the outer yet he came close and developed maglev..If the module is tuned in its horizontal and the spi now becomes that of gyroscopic then via fluidicity all mass is thrown horizontaly such as gyroscope and if perpetuality reached to produce a never ending spin then a total state at 90 degrees is now stabalised to have no wobble at all to the horizontal..and via carving of rotating inner as opposed to outer housing could compress air to be chaneled to atmosphere below or above to create lift or control of the module,its own horizonal fixed and not in need of any control due to its gyroscopic nature of fluidicity.leaves only lift and control of x and y axis but via compression off air within module to be released at atmosphere when needed it would be plain sailing...... the steem engine had only 2 trasitions, the petrol 4 but in both when transition is in motion there is an impossibility that it will kick back against its rotation due to the fact of the crank cam and the fuel imput be whatever..... but if 179 push and of different amounts obviosly some weak some strong and 179 pull in same feild against only ONE in alighnment then onward transition would transpire due to the possition of the outer surround of same prime make up......................in the 70,s we easily accepted decimalisation to work now in factor of 10 but what was lost was a factor of many thousands of years and pounds,ounces, dozens and trading through silver and gold the myans did not trade or calculate in decimal 10 nor egyption or roman...pythagoras gave us solution to angles but then why in king josers chamber in egypt is inscriptions of 22 chambers surrounding 7 . 22 divided by 7 is pye 3.142..........and how can 359 divided by 5 give71.8000 367 divided by 5 give 73.4000 times367 is 26350.6....71.8000 times 359 is26350.6..... yet differance is 0 using 5 a prime as its divisible one would think that by reversing in the multiplication is bound to produce 0 then why359 divide by 7 is 51.2857...............367 divide by 7 is 52.4286................. but 51.2857 times 367 is 18821.8519...and 52.4286 times 359 is 18821.8647 an indifference of plus 0.0i55 in the graph using primes 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 27 29 a plus minus plus minus zero plus minus etc is quite an eye opener but that is only one of many i find upon the way of having solved but carrying on because i want to know why and how!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| Date: |
26 October 2008
|
| report abuse
|
|
Answers (Ordered by Date)
|
| |
No answers yet |
| Add an Answer >> |
|
